Groups
question AG’s powers
24 Feb 2020
PETALING
JAYA: More groups have come out to criticise the decision by Attorney General
Tan Sri Tommy Thomas (pic)
to drop 34 charges against 12 Malaysians accused of being involved in the
Liberation of Tamil Tigers Eelam (LTTE).
The
Malaysian Youth Council (Majlis Belia Malaysia) said the wide powers granted to
the AG under Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution had led to uneasiness
among the public.
“The
AG should have shown his eagerness in promoting the rule of law by continuing
with the prosecution instead of using his power to withdraw the charges. Isn’t
it fairer for all sides if the trial goes on until a decision is reached?
“The
charges are related to an organisation deemed as a terrorist group by Malaysia.
Don’t Malaysians have the right to feel safe from any element that may pose a jeopardy
to them?
“Justice
must not only be done, but must be seen to be done, ” said its legal, advocacy
and human rights bureau chairman Mohd Fared Mohd Khalid.
Withdrawing
the charges, said Mohd Fared, had affected the image of the police as if the
completed investigations did not meet the standards of the AG to the extent
that these had to be dropped.
He
said this would also give rise to a negative perception of the AG as many of
those accused were from DAP.
“We
urge the authorities to take immediate measure to reduce the powers of the AG
so that the doctrine of separation of powers can be returned, ” he said, adding
that this was also in line with Pakatan Harapan’s manifesto.
“Such
powers made the AG the most powerful individual in Malaysia, ” said Mohd Fared.
Last
Friday, Thomas announced the decision to drop the case against the 12, saying
this was based on his discretionary powers under the Constitution after finding
insufficient evidence that it would lead to a “no realistic prospect of
conviction”.
The
12, including two DAP state assemblymen – Melaka state exco member G.
Saminathan and Negri Sembilan assemblyman P. Gunasekaran – were detained under
the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma) and charged under
Section 130 of the Penal Code for allegedly supporting terrorism and having
links to LTTE.
They
were detained by the Counter Terrorism Division on Oct 10 and 12 last year in
various parts of the country.
On
Saturday, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said the AG had no power under the law to interfere
in the matters of the Home Minister, who had the right to include LTTE in the
list of terrorist groups.
Umno
vice-president Datuk Seri Khaled Nordin said the AG’s decision had given rise
to various implications, especially when the prosecution had earlier argued
against any bail for the accused.
“Such
a decision would need the government to review its policy on counterterrorism
in the country, ” he said, adding that possessing materials related to any
terrorist individual, ideology or movement were against the laws in many
countries, including Malaysia.
“The
decision clearly goes against the global consensus on anti-terrorism and
countering radicalism, ” he said in a statement.
Khaled
added that the decision had also affected the competency and integrity of the
police, and asked if this would see a review of other Sosma cases and other
prosecutions related to the Islamic State and Jemaah Islamiyah.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.