Occupational Cancer - Hazards in the
Workplace Environment
According to the National Institute of Occupational Safety
and Health ("NIOSH") it is estimated that "approximately 20,000
cancer deaths and 40,000 new cases of cancer each year in the U.S. are
attributable to occupation." Occupational cancer, or workplace cancer, are
malignancies resulting from a person's workplace or job and arise from exposure
to toxic substances and carcinogens. Some of the most common occupational
cancers which may spawn occupational hazard lawsuits include: mesothelioma
(caused by asbestos exposure), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) (caused by
benzene exposure), liver cancer (vinyl chloride exposure), kidney cancer (coke
oven exposure at steel plants), and bladder cancer (work in rubber, chemical
and leather industries). All of these occupational cancer origins have been
proven in multiple occupational hazard lawsuits in the last half a century.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration
("OSHA") was established in 1971 to help control occupational
exposures to harmful substances, including agents that cause workplace cancer.
However, the standards set by OSHA are not purely health standards. While
health is taken into account in setting permissible exposure levels
("PEL") for workers, OSHA must also consider the economic effect of
the standards on the regulated industry. Occupational hazard lawsuits have
shown some manufacturers and industries have failed to warn their employees of
the risk of workplace cancer simply because of the economic implications
(purchasing safety gear, mandatory employee resting/breaking periods, higher
"danger pay" salaries, etc.).
There are effective tools to help prevent occupational
cancer. First, manufacturers must place warnings on dangerous products to alert
workers of cancer risks posed by a product. In many lawsuits for occupational
hazards is it shown during the lawsuit that many companies have historically failed
to warn about the cancer causing risks of their products. A prime example is
the failure of asbestos companies to warn employees in the workplace of the
cancer related hazards associated with asbestos products. This failure to warn
is the basis of many occupational hazard lawsuits brought against the asbestos
industry. Second, respiratory protection can help protect workers from exposure
to harmful respiratory carcinogens.
However, a worker must be warned about a hazard to become
aware of the need to wear respiratory protection. Many hazardous substances,
like asbestos, pose invisible hazards. Asbestos is an example of a substance
that has no natural warning properties. You cannot taste asbestos, you cannot
smell it, and it can be present in harmful amounts that cannot even be seen by
the naked eye. Even if the chemical is not odorless or is in plain view, the
unfortunate truth is that many people who contract cancer from their workplace
knew they were exposed to the chemical but were unaware of cancer causing risks
associated with it.
The study of occupational cancer dates back to the 1940s and
earlier. A seminal book was published in 1942 by cancer researcher, Wilhelm
Heuper, entitled "Occupational Tumor and Allied Diseases". In that
book, Dr. Heuper concluded that asbestos was a likely cause of lung cancer.
Occupational cancer continues to be studied and is a primary area of study for
NIOSH. (See http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/cancer).
If you have developed cancer from a workplace or a job, you
should have your case reviewed by an experienced occupational cancer attorney
to discuss filing an occupational hazard lawsuit. At LPK, we have successfully
represented workers exposed to cancer causing agents in the workplace for more
than 25 years. The occupational cancer attorneys at LPK work with established
scientists in fields including toxicology, epidemiology, industrial hygiene,
occupational medicine and genetics.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.